AML 1/72nd Lavochkin La-5 and La-5F
Party on Lavochkin Avenue
|
 |
Introduction
Finally it happened!
After
more than 20 years after release of KP La-5FN and more than 15 years after
appearance of VES La-5 kits we are getting a whole new family of Lavochkin
fighters in 72nd scale: La-5, La-5F, La-5FN, and La-5UTI.
This time they come from AML of Czech Republic, the company who specializes
on limited run models and excellent decals.
I am reviewing two kits: La-5 (AML 72 038) and La-5F (AML 72 039). Both
kits come in typical AML boxes with blue trim. Box art is attractive and
well executed.
The Kits
Let’s
open boxes and see what is inside. There are two sprues of light gray
plastic, one containing fuselage halves and cowling details while the
other sprue is common to all versions and contains the rest of the parts.
Two types of wings’ upper parts are included – one pair for
La-5/5F and another for La-5FN. The same is true for exhaust louvers and
carburetor intake parts. Two more cowlings are included. Plastic parts
have virtually no flash on larger details but more of it on small parts.
Some parts have sink marks. On my samples the rudder in La-5F kit has
rather significant sink mark while in La-5 set it is just fine (the sprues
are identical as I mentioned before). On the other hand fuselage of La-5F
in the area of vertical stabilizer is slightly deformed. Nothing dramatic
here and most likely it will not happen on a different sample. Wings have
nice and crisp engraving but engraving on the fuselage is less than perfect
with rather deep and wide panel lines. Since there are not many of these
lines it will be no big deal to improve their appearance.
The
most important question is about accuracy and general appearance of the
models. First look reveals that cowling shape and diameter of the front
opening look good, in fact they look much better than incorrectly shaped
cowlings of KP and VES ki.
Superimposing the fuselage halves with drawings from MBI book on La-5
by Milos Vestsik show spot-on match (at least to my eyes) and if someone
will find it not to be true, the difference might be no more than the
thickness of the drawing line.
Distance
between wheel wells is also correct unlike old KP and VES kits. General
shape is pretty good and it passed another test: I put together fuselage
halves of AML La-5F and Eduard La-7. They match in terms of outlines.
Wingspan measures at 133mm, while it should be 136mm to represent 9.8m
of the real thing.
Further inspection of the boxes reveals very nice resin set and photo-etched
fret. These parts make significant improvement in detailing and general
appearance of the models.
Resin
parts are made from light-cream polyurethane resin and provide the following
details: M-82 (ASh-82) engine, cockpit floor details, cockpit side walls,
very well executed pilot seat and interior details, gun blisters, wheel
wells, which provides for accurate depth, exhaust stacks and doors, and
carburetor intake details. Sure, many of these details are provided in
plastic but resin parts provide for crisper and cleaner representation.
Canopy (2 included just in case) is provided in vacuumform and allows
two versions of installation: one is traditional – cut it to the
shape and fit to the fuselage,while another method is to cut it with a
base as a rectangular “package”, cut plastic on the fuselage
and fit the “package” to plastic (such solution could be seen
on High Planes Yak-9U and Neomega vacuumform canopies for Pe-2).
Photo-etched
fret contains instrument panel, some cockpit details, and engine louvers.
Decals for La-5 contain 4 versions and for La-5F – 6 versions.
They are very nice as is typical for this manufacturer. Additional decal
sets available from AML and discussed by me in a separate review will
greatly add to possible markings options.
Instructions are simple to follow. Few inconsistencies were detected
in the instruction. Resin parts for antenna mast and antenna post on the
stabilizer are shown and labeled (PUR parts 32 and 33) but these parts
are not included and these part numbers are assigned to cockpit details
parts. Some other PUR parts are misnumbered. But hey, real men do not
need instructions anyway!
 My
prior experience with AML models (P-40B Tomahawk) shows that it requires
patience and honest modeling (perhaps forgotten by many) to achieve fantastic
results.
I am sure this will be similar case here.
Conclusion
Do not expect shake and bake type of assembly. These are limited run
kits after all and AML never pretended it will be a walk in the park.
Considering its limited run nature, good number of resin details and
PE parts and vacuumform canopy, I will recommend these kits to experienced
modelers who are willing to invest their time and effort in these challenging
but rewarding projects.
My thanks to AML and Ing. Ladislav
Hladik for review samples. |
|