SQL/DB Error -- [
    Error establishing a database connection!
  1. Are you sure you have the correct user/password?
  2. Are you sure that you have typed the correct hostname?
  3. Are you sure that the database server is running?
]
SQL/DB Error -- [
    Error selecting database shb1_200_1!
  1. Are you sure it exists?
  2. Are you sure there is a valid database connection?
]

Warning: mysql_error(): supplied argument is not a valid MySQL-Link resource in /home/1/c/cb/cbanyai/internetmodeler.com/public_html/Scripts/ez_sql.php on line 95

Warning: mysql_errno(): supplied argument is not a valid MySQL-Link resource in /home/1/c/cb/cbanyai/internetmodeler.com/public_html/Scripts/ez_sql.php on line 96
SQL/DB Error -- []
Roden 1/32nd Fokker Dr.I
 

Roden 1/32nd Fokker Dr.I

By Tom Solinski

In a very odd coincidence I started to write this on the 87th anniversary of the death of Rittmeister Manfred Albrecht Freiherr von Richthofen.

At last, Roden has filled a too long, empty void in the plastic modeling world with the release of an absolutely beautiful Fokker Dr.I in 1:32 scale.

The Fokker Dr.I

When you talk to someone who is not an aviation fan, you will find that there are "benchmark" airplanes known to the general population, that have taken on legendary status. Most folks can identify a Piper Cub (well any small high wing airplane is a Piper Cub to most of them), the GB R1, and the Boeing 747.

For WW-I aviation the most identified airplane is the all-red/crimson Fokker Dr.I triplane of the "Red Baron". Again paint any triplane/biplane red, and it was flown by the Red Baron, which was a moniker applied to Manfred Albrecht Freiherr von Richthofen only after his death. Fortunately for us, it is this slight bit of knowledge in the general population that gives us models that will sell. As an example of this, the only other big Dr.I, Revell's 1:28 scale kit has been around since the late '50s or early '60s. It is still being produced every few years.

A Google search for Fokker Dr.I will give dozens of excellent sites dedicated to the history and preservation of this aircraft. My favorite is here: Welcome To Fokker DR1.com - Research on the Fokker Dr.I These folks are attempting to photographically identify each of the 320 Dr.Is that were built. At this time their record stands at 76 (24%) not bad, considering we're looking for photographs that are at least 86 years old!

A compressed history: In 1917, the German pilots had started to encounter a new three-winged variant of the Sopwith Pup - The Sopwith Triplane. This allied triplane was able to out-turn the best of the German Albatros fighters, and subsequently the triplane was shooting more of the Albatros' down! A call went out to the German aviation manufacturers to develop their own triplane to counter this new English threat. The famous "let's build one to counter theirs" military plan that continues to this day.

Several of the designers followed Sopwith's lead and simply slapped three wings on an existing biplane fuselage. But Fokker went in a different direction and started with a clean sheet of paper. (Sound of a foot stomping on the floor, as in pay attention, this is important!) He chose a radically new approach for the new wing, a very fat, relatively short span, internally braced wing that eliminated the need for drag producing flying wires. He introduced the cantilevered wing, the design we consider "normal" to this day.

The concept behind the design is that if you keep the wingspan short enough, you will keep the bending loads low, and you no longer need flying wires. But with a short wing you still have to have enough surface area to fly on, thus add more wings! The result was a stubby little three-winged prototype called the Fokker V.4.

Fokker had so much faith in the cantilever design that there weren't even struts between the outer ends of the wingtips. That quickly changed because the wings flexing in opposite directions stressed (unnerved, scared, terrified-you get the idea) the test pilots. In the end the little fighter went through several identifiers before it was accepted; first it was a production version prototype the V.5, then for a short while the Fokker D-VI, then, lastly, was accepted as the Fokker F.I.

At first only three pre-production aircraft F.I 101/17, 102/17 and 103/17 were accepted by the German military. The latter two aircraft went off to the front for combat evaluation. F.I 101/17 was retained by Fokker for testing. F.I 102/17 went to Jasta 11 on 21 August 1917, and became the personal mount of Rittmeister Manfred Freiherr von Richthofen. Unfortunately for von Richthofen, the aircraft was being flown by Ltn Kurt Wolff, who was shot down on 15 September 1917 (just 25 days later).

F.I 103/17 went to Jasta 10 on 21 August 1917, and became the personal mount of Werner Voss. He lost his life on 23 September 1917 (just 33 days later) while single-handedly taking on no fewer than seven RAF SE-5a aircraft in this same aircraft. Not a very auspicious start for our stubby little fighter.

Several minor changes in the production line again changed the official designation to Dr.I, the obvious contraction for the German Driedeker, or three-winged aircraft. The noticeable changes on the Dr.I was the elimination of a gentle curve in the leading edge of the horizontal stabilizer, enlarging of the counter balances on the elevator, and adding axe handles to the bottom of the lower wings to act as skids, minimizing damage to the wing in the event of dragging a wingtip.

The only other changes notable in the Dr.I production run were slight variations in the engine cowl configurations, and there were two slightly different configurations of aileron. The first Dr.I captured and evaluated by the allies had one of each of these different ailerons simply due to the fact the old one was broken and the new, different shaped one, fit. This, for years, lead to a misbelief that all of the Dr.Is had asymmetric ailerons to counteract engine torque, when in reality it was just a logistics fluke.

In all only 320 F.Is & Dr.Is were delivered. They served in the front lines from 20 October 1917 until June of 1918 when they were replaced by Albatros, Pfalz and other Fokker fighters. There was a brief time out of service when all of the Dr.Is were grounded due to faulty workmanship in the wings, compounded by water entrapment, which caused the wings to fall apart in flight. Anthony Fokker was forced to replace all of the wings in service out of his company's own profit. The Dr.Is continued to serve in fighter schools to the end of the war.

The Kit

Every so often, one has to take a moment and laugh at our hobby. I consider it a privilege to receive a kit from IM and the manufacturer to build for a review. In this case, Roden sent the evaluation copy to IM at the same time the first shipment of kits was hitting the hobby store shelves. In my kits' case, it came in a box with another Roden kit I'd volunteered to evaluate. Both kits were "knocked down" their boxes were not assembled, and the lids were flat, and the bags of parts and decals were floating free in a larger box. So, in order to start the evaluation of this kit, I had to assemble from a pile of kit parts to make a kit, just to have an example of the kit to review. Never mind, it's late.

Markings

In the case of Roden kit number 601, Roden continues its road to producing high quality WW-I model airplanes. The box art represents Rittmeister Manfred von Richthofen's Dr.I 477/17; an aircraft that is mostly streaked green, with red trim on the wing, engine and tail. Other finishing options show on the plans and included in the decal sheet are for 586/17 a black and white streaked Dr.I flown by Ltn. Ernst Udet; a green streaked black and white trimmed 213/17 flown by Ltn. Freidrich Kempf; and the all black "god of the north wind" 450/17 flown by Ltn. Joseph Carl Jacobs.

Parts and Pieces

The kit comes with seven light brown/khaki very nicely done sprues holding a total of 100 (my count on the sprue) parts. Included in this parts count are the alternate horizontal stabilizer and elevator for the F.I versions of the aircraft. Other options are a pair of machine guns that are molded to accept a PE cooling jacket, but this first version of the kit omits PE entirely. There is also a choice of two different propellers. The engine alone consists of 16 parts, featuring each cylinder head molded as a separate part.

There is an extensive amount of detail for the interior representing the fuselage structural tubing and all of visible parts. My first personal disappointment is that the inside fuselage has two huge ejector towers on each side, one of which, is exactly in line with the cockpit opening.

Also the side fairing from the engine to the fuselage of the Dr.I were fairly large, very prominent triangular shaped plywood skins trapped between the steel framing and the fabric skin. Roden has chosen not to mold these into the fuselage. Although it just dawned on me that these are ideal pieces to add as PE at a later date.

Some early problems

Already some other relatively minor discrepancies have begun to show up on Internet sites from early builders. There appears to be some mis-numbering between the parts and the plans. Specifically the upper-wing tips are parts 7A, and 8A, and the mid-and lower-wing tips are 10D & 11D. The instructions start by calling for the installation of a part 11D at each end of the upper-wing, then 7A and 8A at each end of the mid-wing, ending with a part 11D at each end of the lower-wing. The correct configuration should be 7A and 8A respectively at the right and left upper-wing tips, followed by 10D and 11D, respectively at the right and left mid- and lower-wing tips.

I also disagree with some of the color callouts that Roden specifies in the instructions. In this case, they call for OD green on the sides and upper surface in the interior of the fuselage, and wood for the bottom panels. In my opinion, the whole should be a linen color. The bottom of the Dr.I was just fabric covering over the tube frame. All of the fabric received several coats of clear dope to taughten it to the drum tight finish needed. Then the OD streaky paint was applied. The clear dope would have prevented the colored dope from staining the inside surface so it would have remained linen colored.

Again all of these complaints are extremely minor and can be easily rectified.

And the good news!

At last we have a 1:32 Fokker Dr.I to fill a too long empty hole the kit collection. It's a good kit, looking to be much easier to build than most WW-I topics. The details are great and there are no starving cows on the fabric wings. There has been much, too much controversy on just how doped fabric should look like on open framed wooden wing. In this case I think Roden got it just right!

Again I'd like to thank Roden, I.M. and Matt Bittner for the opportunity to do this review and build.