SQL/DB Error -- [
    Error establishing a database connection!
  1. Are you sure you have the correct user/password?
  2. Are you sure that you have typed the correct hostname?
  3. Are you sure that the database server is running?
]
SQL/DB Error -- [
    Error selecting database shb1_200_1!
  1. Are you sure it exists?
  2. Are you sure there is a valid database connection?
]

Warning: mysql_error(): supplied argument is not a valid MySQL-Link resource in /home/1/c/cb/cbanyai/internetmodeler.com/public_html/Scripts/ez_sql.php on line 95

Warning: mysql_errno(): supplied argument is not a valid MySQL-Link resource in /home/1/c/cb/cbanyai/internetmodeler.com/public_html/Scripts/ez_sql.php on line 96
SQL/DB Error -- []
Lindberg 1/48 XFY-1 VTO “Pogo”
 

Lindberg 1/48 XFY-1 VTO “Pogo”

By Gerry Nilles

History

Historically speaking the Convair XFY-1 “Pogo” has the distinction of being the very first pure VTOL (Vertical Take-off and Landing) fixed wing aircraft built and flight-tested in only that mode. While, the Lockheed XFV-1 “Salmon”, did indeed get airborne it did so using a trolley device that allowed it to take off and land in a conventional horizontal configuration, but it never managed to operate in an exclusive VTOL manner.

The idea of a conventional aircraft with vertical take-off and landing capability is of course not new, but until the late 1940s and early 1950s, the technology to accomplish it had not caught up with the concept. At the end of WWII, a wealth of advanced German aircraft designs, including VTOL ideas fell into allied hands. The Germans, for obvious reasons, had been doing extensive research on the potential of aircraft that were free from having to use vulnerable fixed position runways, a concept that naval planners could, to significant degree also applied to aircraft carriers. This vulnerability along with the potential of VTOL capable combat aircraft was not lost on the Allies. As such, both the U.S. Air Force and Navy look into their practical use.

The Navy would be the first to produce hardware to test the concept. Using the designated Allison XT40-A-6 turboprop engine (the direct predecessor to the T54 which is used on the C-130) Convair and Lockheed along with others submitted airframe designs to the Navy in late 1950. Convair favored a delta wing that of course became a standard for that company, where as Lockheed went with a stubby dual tapered wing that was similar in plan-form to that used on the F-104 Starfighter. In March of 1951 the Navy selected these two companies to build prototypes. VTOL, being a new and untested concept, not surprisingly took a significant longer time from drawing board to flight test. Therefore, it was not until 1954 that initial testing began. By prior agreement Convair chose to go directly to vertical take-off and landing where as Lockheed followed the more conservative and traditional horizontal approach.

As noted above flight-testing began in 1954. Initially the XFY-1 “Pogo” flights, if you can really call them that, take place in a large blimp hanger while tethered to a giant crane. The reason for this is to gain confidence with both the reliability of the new Allison engine and the flight control system. As confidence in both engine reliability and the flight control systems, grow the implementation of free, un-tethered, flight proceeds. On November 5 1954, after a number of partial up and down only tests, a history making public demonstration of a complete take-off, transition to level flight and then back occurred.

Interestingly, and although successful testing of the “Pogo” was accomplished, the overall program was considered unsuccessful. Positive control of the decent rate was never obtained and as such it was determined that the skill required to pilot one of these machines was beyond that of the standard naval aviator. Take off and landing on a stationary surface in perfect conditions was difficult enough let alone trying to do it on the pitching deck of a ship in less than ideal weather, which incidentally was never attempted. In addition, in order to have adequate visibility during the landing phase the pilot literally had to contort into a neck wrenching position that was not only almost physically impossible but also extremely dangerous in the event of the need for ejection from the aircraft. Today the single example of XFY-1 is at the Smithsonian Aircraft Restoration Facility awaiting refurbishment.

The Kit

This kit is over fifty years old. Originally released some time in the 1950s it is simple with no cockpit detail what so ever. For lack of a better description, and as Chris our publisher put it, it is more like an injection-molded version of a vac-u-formed kit without the soft edges or the need to remove excess plastic. It does have raised panel lines and extensive patterns of tiny rivet heads all over the fuselage and wings. However, on the plus side it is pretty darn accurate not to mention the fact that it is right on scale. I would say that other than its simplicity it is even a little more accurate than its much newer 1/72 scale counterpart from “KP”. Cast in white styrene, with a very clear canopy, and consisting of twenty total parts, eight of which are the prop assembly, it is crisp with little clean up needed. A dry fit check shows it to be decent with no significant problems. The instructions are rudimentary, however with only twenty obvious parts they are easy to follow and quite sufficient.

Markings

The markings carried by the XFY-1 are very basic, consisting of the standard national insignia in four places, Navy in four places, the serial number on one side only, and the Convair Company logo, and block name in two places. Unfortunately and even thought a test aircraft, the XFY-1 was very plain, and other than a black spinner, anti-glare panel and outer tips of the apposing stabilizers, it had no unique or high-visibility markings. The kit decals are both complete and accurate and look to be of good quality.

Conclusion

This kit, despite its age and simplicity is relatively accurate, of course, a scratch built cockpit and ejection seat is required as well as removal of the rivets and re-scribing of the panel lines. However, with these additions and refinements a decent 1/48 scale rendition of history making and unique aircraft is very possible.