SQL/DB Error -- [
    Error establishing a database connection!
  1. Are you sure you have the correct user/password?
  2. Are you sure that you have typed the correct hostname?
  3. Are you sure that the database server is running?
]
SQL/DB Error -- [
    Error selecting database shb1_200_1!
  1. Are you sure it exists?
  2. Are you sure there is a valid database connection?
]

Warning: mysql_error(): supplied argument is not a valid MySQL-Link resource in /home/1/c/cb/cbanyai/internetmodeler.com/public_html/Scripts/ez_sql.php on line 95

Warning: mysql_errno(): supplied argument is not a valid MySQL-Link resource in /home/1/c/cb/cbanyai/internetmodeler.com/public_html/Scripts/ez_sql.php on line 96
SQL/DB Error -- []
Italeri 1/48 Spitfire Mk.XVIe
 

Italeri 1/48 Spitfire Mk.XVIe

By Claudio Kalicinski

History

The Spitfire Mk.XVI was a Mk.IX airframe fitted with the Merlin 266 engine, a Merlin 66 manufactured under license in the US by Packard. Apart from the engine, the Mks XVI and Mk.IX were almost identical and there was little difference in performance. However the Packard engine was different enough from its Roll Royce counterpart to require separate servicing tools and spare parts. To prevent confusion between the two versions it was decided to allocate a new mark number to the Packard engined version, and it became the Mk.XVI.

Most of them had the “E” wing, equipped with two 20mm canons and two 12,7 machine guns, but the canon and the canon stub had changed positions when compared to the Mk.IXc, with the canon now outboard of the stub. The stub itself contained the muzzle of the 12,7 mm machine gun, which now replaced the two lighter 0.303in Brownings which were fitted to the “C” wing. A comparison between the “C” and “E” wings gives the impression that the latter was fitted with a shorter canon than the “C” wing. In fact, both wing types were fitted with the same 20mm Hispano canon, but the “E” wing´s canon was situated slightly further back than the “C” wing´s canon, making it appearing shorter.

Later production aircraft featured the cut-down rear fuselage with the all-around vision sliding hood, along with a pointed rudder. All this helped contributing to the false impression that the Mk.XVI was a different aircraft to the Mk.IX, rather than a variation of a theme, as it were.
Mk.XVI started to come off production line in quantity in October 1944, but by this time the Griffon engined Mk.XIV had become the primary air superiority version of the Spitfire. As a result the Mk.XVI flew mainly fighter-bomber missions with the 2nd Tactical Air Force.

Of 20.351 Spitfires built 1.054 were of the Mk.XVI version.

No 349 (Belgian) Squadron

Formed at Ikeja in Nigeria on 10 November 1942, this Belgian manned unit was destined for operations in the Belgian Congo. Equipped with Tomahawks from January 1943, it never actually left Nigeria, instead it was diverted to ferrying duties, delivering fighters from West Africa to the Middle East.
However, on 3 May it disbanded and its personnel were shipped back to the UK and the squadron re-formed at Wittering on 5 June 1943. Equipped with Spitfires, it was declared operational in August the squadron moved south to Southend in October and began offensive operations over the continent.
In May 1944 the squadron joined No 135 Wing at Selsey taking part in operations in preparation for the Normandy landings as well as covering the invasion itself. Moving to France in August it carried out both fighter bomber and bomber escort missions until February 1945, when it returned to the UK and converted to the Tempest V. However, it was decided to cancel its conversion in April and the squadron returned to the continent, joining No 132 Wing in Holland for the remainder of the war. It remained in Germany as part of the occupation forces until being transferred back to Belgian control on 24 October 1946.

The Kit

As you probably already know, the Italeri kit is a reboxing of the Occidental kit, maybe you do remember it, a kit without decals and instructions on the back of the box? That kit was harshly criticized because it had some nose shape problems. I read in other web pages that the kit was fixed, we will see if Italeri finally corrected the nose of this kit, but first, we will see what brings the box.

Well, this reboxing looks far better, with its stunning box art and large decal sheet, than the previous Occidental release. My first impression was really good, the panel lines are nicely engraved, no flash, and only a couple sink areas on the upper surface of the wing (near the wing tip).

The cockpit does not have many details but they are enough to create a good looking interior, I like the instrument’s panel and its raised detail but a decal of separate instruments would be nice to complete the effect. A decal is given for the seatbelts. The spade grip on the control stick is square shaped, this is a mistake because they were round on all Spitfire variants.

The aircraft provides a beautifully clear (but a bit thick) separate canopy and windscreen, so you can display the canopy open.

Only clipped wings are provided and they represent the “C” wing (canon bulge inboard) you have to remove the wing molded gun access doors and (the plastic in the wing interior for this panel is thinned down to aid cutting) replace them with the separate gun access doors, to make the “E” wing (canon bulge outboard). You also need to fill the four cartridge ejector holes because the “E” wing does not have the .303in guns and open the ejector hole for the canon. Also, the wing lacks the prominent bulges over the wheel wells.

The kit includes bomb racks and bombs for both the centerline (500lb) and underwing (250lb) positions.

The tires are nicely represented, even with the maker name on them (Dunlop). Wheel hubs are separate from the tires, and you have the choice between covered or three spoke wheel hubs. Anyway I never saw a picture of a Mk.XVI with covered wheel hubs. The undercarriage legs have a separate part for the oleo link, but the instructions show that the oleo link should be on the back of the undercarriage leg. This is a mistake, the information I have tells me that the link was placed in the front of the leg.

The fuselage is nicely done but I think that the cowling´s bolts are oversized.

An upper section of the Merlin engine is provided on which you have to attach the exhausts. The disadvantage of this is that you have to attach the exhausts before painting the kit, therefore, it involves unnecessary masking when painting this area. By the way, the exhaust are not well represented, it would better go for an aftermarket replacement for these, (Ultracast from Canada made excellent exhaust for the late Merlin engines).

The propeller has separate blades, but the spinner has an extra wrong line, this one has to be filled or sanded (look the picture).

Decals and Markings

The decal sheet looks really good, they are very thin and in perfect register. Markings are supplied for four planes: two RAF aircraft, one of the 349 Sqn. (Belgian) and the other, an all black machine, of the 21 Air Group. The last two machines are, one plane of the 340 Sqn. (Free French) and a Belgian machine. A complete set of maintenance stencils are also included.

Accuracy

Because of the concern about the accuracy of the Occidental kit and being the Italeri model a reboxing of that kit I decided to compare it against the 1/48 scale Spitfire diagrams found in “The Supermarine Spitfire Part 1” by Robert Humphreys and published by SAM Publications.

Sadly, as you can see, the problem was not fixed, the lower cowl is to deep near the spinner and the fuselage is too long by 1.5 mm. The wings are also too large (1mm) but the shape is Ok and the difference is not noticeable. The cowling can be corrected by sanding and filling or replacing it with the Aeroclub correction set.

Conclusion

Well, I think most of the faults of the kit can be easily corrected with a little of work, the only one that could represent a problem is the nose but nothing that can not be solved with more time or the Aeroclub set. Anyway I think is a good workable kit that can result in an excellent model with a bit of effort from the builder, I have no doubts that it will be quite impressive when finished. Stay tuned, full build review to follow.

I want to thank Testors and Matt Bittner for providing me the kit and the opportunity to make this review.

References

  • Robert Humpreys, The Supermarine Spitfire Part 1. SAM Publications 2000
  • Alfred Price, Late Marque Spitfire Aces 1942-45. Osprey Publishing 1995
  • J. P. De Cock, Spitfire Mk.IX/XVI. Éditions Atlas 1978
  • T. Hooton and R. Ward, Aircam Aviation Series Spitfire Mk.I-XVI. Osprey Publishing 1971
  • Monografie Lotnicze, Supermarine Spitfire (Parts 1 to 4). AJ Press 1996
  • Jerry Scutts, Spitfire in Action. Squadron/Signal publications 1980