SQL/DB Error -- [
    Error establishing a database connection!
  1. Are you sure you have the correct user/password?
  2. Are you sure that you have typed the correct hostname?
  3. Are you sure that the database server is running?
]
SQL/DB Error -- [
    Error selecting database shb1_200_1!
  1. Are you sure it exists?
  2. Are you sure there is a valid database connection?
]

Warning: mysql_error(): supplied argument is not a valid MySQL-Link resource in /home/1/c/cb/cbanyai/internetmodeler.com/public_html/Scripts/ez_sql.php on line 95

Warning: mysql_errno(): supplied argument is not a valid MySQL-Link resource in /home/1/c/cb/cbanyai/internetmodeler.com/public_html/Scripts/ez_sql.php on line 96
SQL/DB Error -- []
MAC 1/72nd SPAD VII
 

MAC 1/72nd SPAD VII

By Neil Crawford

The Kit

Ever since I started building SPADs thirty years ago, there has only been one SPAD 7 to choose, the Airfix kit, which was decent enough for it's day, but the corrugated wing-surfaces were a constant source of debate, what to do about them? Those days are behind us, for SPADophiles the new MAC SPAD VII is the answer to our dreams. I'd heard some worrying reports about thick trailing edges, so was expecting something of a short run kit, luckily it was much better than I expected. I got the Roden SE5a at the same time, and of the two I'd say that the MAC SPAD is a better kit. The molding quality of the Roden is slightly better in some areas, but the MAC is also petite in details, and interestingly more sharply molded. The Roden will need a spot of light sanding to smooth out a little surface roughness, that isn't necessary on the MAC, we're talking Hasegawa cleanness here! Other places where the MAC kit scores is the inclusion of a useful set of P/E parts and (marginally) nicer decals. Problems on the MAC kit are just three that I can see so far, the nose side covers are a little too thick, we really need a P/E set for these! And the lower wing to fuselage connection will be weak unless one fits a metal pin. Finally the wings are a little thick, only at the trailing edge, and not so bad as I thought. I compared it to the Ian Stair Windsock plans, because I had them handy, wings are spot-on, interestingly the nose of the kit is a couple of mm shorter, I'm pretty sure this is correct, I think this kit follows the same Czech plans as Special Hobby's 1/48 scale kit does, and these are better than Ian Stair's. I checked the Stair plans against some photos, and decided that he has missed the slightly pug-nosed appearance that the SPAD 7 actually has.

They have done a really good job with the cockpit interior, what is visible is in the kit, no throttle but that's invisible beneath the shelf. I call that sensible. And not only that, the P/E parts fit! What is missing are instruments and they are tricky for a kit manufacturer, being spread out all over the place. The completeness of the MAC cockpit interior meant that I found the energy to do something about the more visible parts of the cockpit. I made instruments by punching out some small plastic circles, which I varnished, then applied Reheat instrument dials, finally I added a Fotocut "jolly good bezel", glued on with thin varnish. The most difficult thing is fiddling them into place on the shelf. I also stuck an instrument dial in the middle of that strange holder so often seen in SPAD cockpits, it makes a change from the usual empty holder.

I got the fuselage glued up next, it was a perfect fit, I'm afraid I have to give Matt Bittner right, the central seam was difficult to get right looking. The problem is that there is a stringer right down the centre, I added a new one from stretched sprue, but I'm not really satisfied, and am looking forward to the Eduard SPAD that doesn't have that problem (I bet it has a few others though!).

What is going to cause pain to some people is the butt joint between the lower wing and fuselage, I'm surprised that MAC didn't do a simple tab here, if only to ensure that the correct angle is obtained. I drilled tiny holes, and inserted thin steel wire reinforcements.

The other problem with the MAC SPAD is the slightly thick trailing edges, the wings themselves are fine, nice and thin with lovely rib detail. I sanded down the trailing edges on the underside, and then I started replacing the detail with a roll of sandpaper, just sanding new grooves where the old ones disappeared, it took a week! What I ask myself is if it's even a good idea, I think removing the lot and doing decal strips would have been more sensible, and probably more realistic, oh well, we live and learn! In fact with paint on, the undersides don't look at all bad, the only reason I didn't take a photo, was that I forgot to!

I had a hiccup when I looked below the fuselage, there is a blank square, then I realised this is as Tomasz Gronczewski describes on late SPAD VII's, so great, another plus for MAC there. But this brings us to a problem of my own making, after a tortuous process of choosing a colour scheme, I decided on De Guibert's early SPAD? Tomasz kindly helped me with some comments on this aircraft's features, here is what Tomasz said: "You won't escape from panels with 32 louvers, but at least upper left panel has one row of louvers. As for me I use thin sharpened screwdriver to make small louvers. Don't be very concerned about their uniformity. The S.P.A.D. engineers weren't either. The SPAD was driven by Levasseur prop. Right half of the early wrap around windscreen had been removed."

Now this is a problem with the MAC SPAD, the nose side panels are correct for normal SPADs but not for these early ones, also they are a little chunkily molded, so I just sanded them off completely! So do we have any bright ideas for restoring them? Apart from hoping that they will be included on a future Part sheet, I had an idea involving, decal paper and a photocopier, also perhaps drawing them in pencil straight on to decal? This worked, but they just didn't look good. The jeweler's screwdriver method works too, but is hard work and I found it difficult to keep straight and evenly spaced. On fewer louvers, and bigger scale it would be perfect.

Finally I cracked it. As usual when in trouble I started thinking of what Harry Woodman would have done, and then it struck me. Kitchen foil! All I need is a good pattern, and I found that on an Airfix SPAD 7. By rubbing kitchen foil on to the louvers you get a perfectly formed reverse pattern that can easily be cut out and stuck on. Problem is I want more louvers, but I discovered that the underchin cowling on the Airfix kit is covered with (wrong-way) louvers, so emboss on that, draw in the outline with pencil, turn over and glue on! I tried strengthening with CA, but that didn't work very well, and wasn't really necessary. I just stuck them on to the nose with Microscale metal foil adhesive. Here's how they looked before painting:

Note also the holes for wing reinforcements, and the high standard of the kits molding.

The spinner which is rather unique for this plane, was made from the tip of a Junkers 88 propeller, just cut off and sanded flat.

Painting

After reading Alan Touelle's masterpiece on the Breguet 14, I decided to go for an off-white finish, the yellowness is due to aging of varnish, and this is a new aircraft. I used Humbrol 41, and then mixed in some brown for the metal panels. I had the "coq sportif" on a sheet of Americals for Jasta 4 (of all things!), the rest of the decals were home made in various fashions. I have a supply of Tango-Papa decal paper, and I highly recommend this, because I always have plenty of scrap decal nowadays. I sprayed a nice bright red (Revell 31) and blue (Humbrol 48) on the sheet, so I had enough for plenty of mistakes, bright colours because I don't believe in toned down French roundels. Then using a compass with a small blade cutter, I cut out the roundels, I had prepared vague white circles in the appropriate places, so red and blue was enough. I cut out paper patterns for the striping, when I was satisfied they would fit, I transferred the pattern to the decal, and cut out with a (very) sharp knife. The spinner was done with the same technique as the roundels.

I found the tail markings on the MAC decal sheet, I just had to remove one figure, and I had the correct number, I also used the MAC decals underneath the wings, yes I'll admit, I don't really give a damn about the undersides of my models, just so long as they're respectable. Also I now know that the MAC decals go on very well, no problems with them.

Woodwork

The interior woodwork is painted, here's a photo of the three stages, first orange paint, then linseed oil mixed with medium brown pigment and a little milk, finally linseed oil with dark brown pigment. A friend, Roger Forsmark taught me this, it's an old Swedish profession, he's done his whole apartment with this technique, it looks like a stately home. It also works very well on models. Here's a little demo he made for me:

Real wood is easy to carve if liberally soaked in CA first, here are my struts, and the beginnings of the propeller.

There is nothing wrong with the MAC struts, they are very petite, but well, if anything can be done more difficultly then I'm all for it! This SPAD had a Levasseur propeller - they had straight leading edges and curved trailing edges (contrary to Gallia or Chauviere props). Also, Levasseur props had squared tips (thanks again Tomasz for that information). The propeller was carved from 4 layers of mahogany model ship planking, glued together with CA, then roughly carved by knife, and finally sanded to shape using varying grades of sandpaper. I had the same kind of prop on my SPAD 12, so I used that as a pattern, constantly checking that carving is in the right place and direction. Despite this, my first prop was too short on one side, so I had to do another one, it didn't matter because I so enjoy carving. Here are some pictures that illustrate the transformation from block to prop.

Assembly and Rigging

Assembly worked very well this time, because I stopped mucking around with epoxy, and went back to my first love, tube glue! It's nice and sticky, dries fairly quickly, yet slow enough for adjustments, I then put on a dot of CA at each joint for added strength.

Rigging is with stainless steel wire, I won't repeat the description of my method for double rigging, it's in my old SPAD 12 article.

On this one, I used stretched sprue for a spacer, the same diameter as the steel wire I use, I didn't bother with a flat profile spacer. This is quite good enough in 1/72, and simplifies things a little. The trick of covering the whole package with decal worked very well, a thin strip of decal laid over the package, will wrap itself around, if enough microsol is applied. keeps the package together nicely, I was worried it might dissolve, the white glue the package was glued together with, so I gave them a coat of thin varnish, so you think why not paint them instead, paint doesn't stick to steel wire, that's why! What colour the decal cover should be is debatable, after studying period photos, I went for black, rather than tan.

After that there was just a whole heap of fiddly little things to be added, which I spent a few days doing.

Summary

It is a marvelous little kit, despite a few problems, even straight from the box it will render a SPAD VII model that really looks like a SPAD VII, and that's a first in 1/72 scale!

Finally a big thanks to Tomasz Gronczewski - his help has been invaluable - and as usual thanks for support to the whole gang over on the WW1-list.